<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Saturn deserves better than revisionists calling the cars ordinary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michiganwllz.com/2009/10/saturn-deserves-better-than-revisionists-calling-the-cars-ordinary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michiganwllz.com/2009/10/saturn-deserves-better-than-revisionists-calling-the-cars-ordinary/</link>
	<description>Love cars? Love travel? Then you&#039;re in the right place</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 03:56:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve Morton</title>
		<link>http://michiganwllz.com/2009/10/saturn-deserves-better-than-revisionists-calling-the-cars-ordinary/comment-page-1/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Morton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 09:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michiganwllz.com/?p=1543#comment-223</guid>
		<description>I never got too excited about their models until at least the late 90&#039;s.  If the quality was that good, where did it show up on J.D. Powers?  I&#039;ve only heard of Buick scoring really well on that for a long time.  (of the GM models, some Cadillac now too)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never got too excited about their models until at least the late 90&#8217;s.  If the quality was that good, where did it show up on J.D. Powers?  I&#8217;ve only heard of Buick scoring really well on that for a long time.  (of the GM models, some Cadillac now too)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
