Cristi Landy, Volt Product Marketing Manager

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Make no mistake, General Motors officials believe the Chevy Volt will change the world when it goes on sale late this year.

“There is a strong desire to go to electrically driven transportation,” said Cristi Landy, GM’s marketing manager for the Volt, speaking to Michigan wllz via Skype from the floor of the Washington Auto Show.

While fully electric vehicles might be the goal, GM and many others believe the driving public isn’t ready for them, mostly because of “range anxiety.” Most electric vehicles have range limited to about 100-200 miles, then require as long as 4 hours to recharge. That’s fine for commuting to work, but not very useful for a trip up north.

GM: Volt performance will not suffer once battery is depleted

But the Volt suffers from no such range anxiety. Company officials expect the Volt to be able to travel about 40 miles — enough for most people to drive to work and back — on battery power alone after getting a full charge from a standard wall outlet. After the Volt’s battery is exhausted, a small gasoline engine will kick in to power a generator, providing electricity to drive the car. The gasoline engine will give the Volt a 300-mile range. At that point the gas tank can be refilled, giving the Volt another 300 miles of range.

Landy admitted that one of the biggest challenges for GM is educating consumers about how the Volt, which GM calls a extended-range electric vehicle, works. She admitted that many people don’t know that the Volt will have a gasoline engine.

“It’s a common misconception we’re constantly battling,” Landy said.

Perhaps more than any new vehicle since the dawn of the automotive age, GM will have to do a lot to educate the public about what the Volt is and how the E-REV system works.

“We have a huge challenge,” Landy said.

Fortunately, GM officials know they have a passionate contingent of potential buyers who have driven other electric vehicles such as the GM EV1, Toyota RAV4 and Mini E.

“They see the Volt as a better solution,” Landy said. Those early adopters are probably the Volt’s best ambassadors.

So what does the future hold for what GM calls Voltec? Where might the technology show up next in GM’s lineup?

“The plan for General Motors is to continue Voltec in other vehicles,” Landy said. “We’re talking about a lot of things.”

A vehicle similar in size to the Volt would be the easiest, she said. But bigger vehicles are also possible.

Many observers at the North American International Auto Show earlier this month were disappointed that GM did not show a production version of the Cadillac Converj, an E-REV concept that GM introduced at the 2009 show. Vice Chairman Bob Lutz told a group of analysts that GM planned to build the car, but Cadillac officials said later that a decision had not been finalized.

Gibbs Technologies plans to build several first responder and military vehicles using its High-Speed Amphibian technology.

By BRYAN LAVIOLETTE

Mike Davis of the Detroit Bureau thinks antique military World War II DUKWs or “Ducks” as they were commonly known could help aid workers deliver supplies to Haiti following the earthquake.

http://www.thedetroitbureau.com/2010/01/wwii-ducks-could-aid-haiti-relief/

But in the future, Gibbs Technologies has a better idea. Among other vehicles, Gibbs is working on some first responder rescue vehicles as well as amphibious military vehicles which would be ideally suited to the task.

Many of those old DUKWs are in use in tourist areas such as the Wisconsin Dells. Davis writes that many of those vehicles have been retrofitted for tourism use, and might need to be quickly outfitted for use bringing supplies to Haiti.

The problem is Haiti’s already incomplete infrastructure has been battered to the point that getting supplies to the island nation has been difficult.

But an amphibious vehicle would solve the problem. An amphibian would be able to drive right up on a beach, eliminating issues with ships being able to get close enough to the island to offload cargo.

Gibbs’ vehicles would have the added benefit of being able to travel at high speed on the water. Faster trips mean more trips in the same amount of time.

The Auburn Hills company is still working on production versions of its vehicles, so the day when it’s amphibious vehicles will wisk supplies to places ravaged by natural disasters is a ways off.

2011 Ford Fiesta bumper.

2011 GMC Acadia Denali mirror

Buick Regal GS air duct

Fiat 500 Abarth

2011 Ford Mustang GT 5.0

Taillights from an electric vehicle

GMC Granite concept headlight

2011 Jaguar

DETROIT — Maybe last year’s show set this year’s up for a letdown.

At the 2009 show, General Motors went on the offensive with major announcements about its plans for a battery research facility, Chevy Volt production plans, partnership programs with battery manufacturers and a new Cadillac concept using the Volt’s technology.

It was exciting because GM, facing the toughest trials of its existence, went on the offensive and actually wrested the fuel economy lead away from Toyota.

But on Monday, Toyota and Ford went on their own offensives. Jim Lentz, head of Toyota’s U.S. sales arm, said that the company planned to develop a “family” of Prius hybrid vehicles. It also announced that there are eight new hybrid models in the pipeline and that the company plans to increase global hybrid production from 530,000 in 2009 to 1 million within the next couple of years.

Lentz went on to say that the company is approaching what it calls “sustainable mobility” with a four-prong approach that includes the company’s hybrids, plug-in hybrids, fuel cell vehicles and battery electric vehicles.

Toyota has already announced a new plug-in Prius that the company will build in limited numbers later this year. Lentz also said that the company plans to market a fuel cell vehicle by 2015.

So what was on GM’s agenda regarding fuel economy? GM showed production versions of the Chevy Spark and Cruze, vehicles it has shown previously. It also showed a sporty concept of the next generation Chevy Aveo and of course the Volt.

It also showed an urban utility vehicle concept for GMC called the Granite,  a Denali version of the GMC Acadia and a Buick Regal called the GS.

As for big announcements about advanced powertrains, GM officials didn’t offer much. It still has a press conference scheduled for Tuesday to talk about plans for Cadillac, but no major announcements on fuel economy are expected.

At last year’s show, GM showed the Cadillac Converj concept using the Volt’s high-tech powertrain. Some had hoped that GM would announce that the Converj was a go, but right now, all that is expected is for Cadillac to show the CTS-V Coupe.

Ford also stepped up with some major announcements. The Dearborn automaker announced plans to invest $450 million and create 1,000 jobs to build lithium ion batteries for hybrid and plug-in hybrid vehicles.

“This investment underscores how serious we are about delivering a range of electrified vehicles to customers — including hybrids, plug-in hybrids and pure electric vehicles,” Bill Ford Jr., Ford’s executive chairman, said in a statement.

The driver of a UPS truck flashes a "Hey Good Looking" sign at the pre-production Chevrolet Volt during an engineering test drive along I-80 near Toledo, Ohio, Oc 13. (Photo by Jeffrey Sauger for General Motors)

DETROIT — General Motors wants everyone to know the Chevy Volt won’t suffer any loss of performance when it switches from battery power to its gasoline engine.

GM expects the Volt to accelerate from 0-60 mph in 8.5 seconds. But Car and Driver magazine’s Tony Quiroga wrote in April that the Volt would not be as quick after its battey was depleted.

What isn’t yet clear is how the Volt will behave when the battery is depleted and the gasoline engine kicks in to provide more juice. In this so-called range-extending mode, the electric motor will be limited to the power provided by the 1.4-liter four-cylinder engine under the hood. The gas engine is never used to charge the battery; the engine turns a generator that directly feeds power to the electric motor. If the engine is revving at 2000 rpm and making 25 hp, the electric motor will be able to make only 25 hp. If more power is needed, the gasoline engine could conceivably run at its power peak at a very high rpm. Taking the point further, if the gas engine is rated for only 100 hp (our estimate of its power output), the 149-hp electric motor will be able to make only 100 hp. The upshot: The Volt will be quicker running on battery power than it will be when the gas engine is providing the electricity.What isn’t yet clear is how the Volt will behave when the battery is depleted and the gasoline engine kicks in to provide more juice. In this so-called range-extending mode, the electric motor will be limited to the power provided by the 1.4-liter four-cylinder engine under the hood. The gas engine is never used to charge the battery; the engine turns a generator that directly feeds power to the electric motor. If the engine is revving at 2000 rpm and making 25 hp, the electric motor will be able to make only 25 hp. If more power is needed, the gasoline engine could conceivably run at its power peak at a very high rpm. Taking the point further, if the gas engine is rated for only 100 hp (our estimate of its power output), the 149-hp electric motor will be able to make only 100 hp. The upshot: The Volt will be quicker running on battery power than it will be when the gas engine is providing the electricity.

“There’s no degradation in performace,” said Rob Peterson, communications manager for the Volt, while showing car at The Business of Plugging In electric vehilce conference last week.”That would be death to electric vehicles and death to the Volt.”

Peterson said that while C/D’s calculations about the relationship between the electric motor and the gas engine are correct, the magazine didn’t account for additional power from the battery once the car has switched to its gasoline engine. Peterson said the battery will get some energy from the gas engine and regenerative braking, but it will not get enough power to revert to using battery power alone.

“We want the driver of the vehicle to arrive home with an empty battery as often as possible.

Peterson and other executives at the conference excitedly described a recent 1,200-mile, multi-state drive of eight Volt development mules.

GM plans to begin production of the Volt in late 2010 as a 2011 model. The company has promised that the Volt will travel up to 40 miles on battery power after a full charge. After exhausting the battery, the gasoline engine generator will power the car, giving it a range of 300 miles.

While GM has not finalized prices, it expects it to cost about $40,000. A $7,500 tax credit will soften that price.

Cole, chairman of the Center for Automotive Research, said he’s not sure the market for amphibious cars that Gibbs Technologies is counting on is going to be very big.

To read the full story, visit Amphibious wllz

Gov. Granholm wants electric vehicle companies to locate in Michigan

What if the price of gasoline drops below $2 per gallon? Electric vehicles of all stripes no longer look very appealing. But if gasoline prices increase to $5, consumers will be stumbling over each other to get them. If you’re an automaker, not to mention a supplier, how do you plan how many to build? They might as well throw dice.

Bringing cost certainty to fuel prices would help the automakers make reasonable product plans.

So here’s an idea to do it:

My proposal would use a flexible tax to maintain fuel prices within a range that would be set by a government board.

As an example, gasoline is currently about $2.60 per gallon including state, federal and local taxes. If the board set a target price of $3.50, it could authorize an additional tax of 90 cents on each gallon.

Next summer, as the economy rebounds, let’s say the price of gasoline jumps to $4.25 per gallon. The board would use proceeds from previous low points in the market to pay to reduce the price back to the target of $3.50. The board would allow the price of gasoline to fluctuate in a range of 50 cents to allow for price competition, regional differences and day-to-day ups and downs of the fuel market.

The board could also raise its target price incrementally with plenty of advance notice. Right now, consumers find out that gasoline has climbed over $4 when it’s time to visit the corner gas station for a fillup. But this program would allow consumers to know when prices were going up and by how much.

In a way, the plan is similar to what many consumers do when they opt for the budget plan for their heat bill. Instead of bills that fluctuate between summer lows of $20 per month and $250 per month in the winter, they opt to pay a set amount each month, so they pay $100.

Without cost certainty, automakers and all of the others planning for the electrification of the vehicle are spending development money on something that the public might not want or need. Sure, General Motors is about to introduce the Chevrolet Volt extended-range electric vehicle with it’s promise of unprecedented combination of fuel economy and range, but if the price of gasoline drops to $1.50, GM could lose hundreds of millions of dollars on its investment.

In fact, David Cole, chairman of the Center for Automotive Research, agreed with the premise.

“We have to have reasonably stable fuel prices or we will have an ongoing disaster in the auto industry,” Cole said.

Who is going to buy a Volt, which will be more expensive than similar-size cars, if you can fill the tank of a regular one for $15?

In fact, John Lauckner, vice president of global program management for GM and the father of the Volt, said that even today’s fuel costs could cause problems for the Volt.

“At the cost of fuel today we’ve got a lot of work to do to make them cost competitive,” said Lauckner, speaking at the conference at the MotorCity Hotel and Conference Center. He said he would not call for a new gas tax.

Establishing this sort of program would take true leadership from Congress. Many people would complain that the government couldn’t be trusted to spend the money as intended.

For that reason alone, it’s unlikely to happen.

Waraniak, vice president for vehicle technology for the Specialty Equipment Market Association, said during a panel discussion at the conference that tuners will continue to have fun modifying electric vehicles, just as they do with the current internal combustion engine in today’s cars.

“Horsepower and green power can coexist,” Waraniak said.

In between friendly jabs from fellow panelists about his mullet hair style and cowboy boots, Waraniak said aftermarketers will create the buzz to show that electric vehicles can be cool.

“We’re talking about hot rod hybrids and high-performance electrics,” Waraniak said. “This is one of the neatest times to be in the auto industry.”

He said there are four megatrends that dominate the auto industry: Green, safe, connected and cool.

Sure, performance cars will be different. While today’s generation of hot rodders grew up on the sweet smell of exhaust and the loud sounds from big-block V-8s, the next generation might take a completely different view of performance. Waraniak said it is sort of like today’s young people who never heard a dial tone on a home phone.

“My car’s quieter than yours,” Waraniak said future hot rodders might say to each other.

At the same time these new machines push the performance boundaries, they will also get superior fuel mileage. For example, Waraniak talked about the Lincvolt, a 1959 Lincoln with 500 horsepower that gets 80 mpg that is owned by musician Neil Young. Waraniak said Young chose the massive Lincoln to show high fuel mileage is possible in any car.

Waraniak said SEMA’s members are working on other technologies, such as using suspension motions to generate electricity to help drive the vehicle. So the pothole actually is good for something.

He said that green performance is a major growth area for SEMA and will have a major presence at the association’s annual mega show in Las Vegas Nov. 2-5.

Gen. Wesley Clark challenges the auto industry to use the electric vehicle to jumpstart the economy

A case in point is David Joos, president and CEO of CMS Energy, who spoke at The Business of Plugging In, a conference aimed at the plug-in electric vehicle industry. Joos, whose company owns Consumers Power Co., said he disagrees with the calls for infrastructure updates made by Peter Darbee, chairman of Pacific Gas & Electric.

During an earlier panel discussion Tuesday morning at the Motor City Hotel and Conference Center, Darbee said the nation’s electrical system is going to need massive upgrades to cope with electric vehicles drawing power.

“We have let our infrastructure go,” Darbee said. “Are we ready? Not entirely now.”

But Joos said the system will be able to cope with the added load because electric vehicles will be added to the grid slowly. On top of that, the most electric vehicles will be charged overnight when demand on the electric-generation system are its lowest.

Consumers only uses about 50 percent of its peak capacity most of the time because it has to be prepared to cope with high-usage periods such as hot summer days when homeowners run their air conditioning. Adding electric vehicles won’t affect Consumers’ need for peak power, he said.

But Darbee also said that government and utilities have to start installing charging stations so electric vehicles can be charged when they owners are parked at work or while shopping.

Joos said there will be time to implement those facilities.

“You don’t need extra public charging outlets at the outset,” Joos said.

Darbee said that the government needs to do more to support the fledgling electric vehicle industry. He suggested that there should be a carbon tax on vehicles using old fossil-fuel technology to pay for vehicles of the future and encourage buyers to move toward them. Darbee was one of many speakers to point out that the U.S. government subsidizes low gasoline prices with its efforts in the Middle East to keep oil flowing.

“This is something we all should line up and go and support fervently,” Darbee said.

On that point, Joos and Darbee agree. Joos said Consumers is bullish on electric vehicle technology.

Click here to read the rest of the story on Mlive.